Rerun

 

It's been a year since I posted the information below and we now have a federal administration that 1) hates the FBI, and 2)advocates strongly for using the death penalty, so I think it's time to rerun the following information.

"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!

 My friend Medawar has published a new post that I am sharing here with permission. I must point out that because this stuff is done primarily by computers and phones, law enforcement is able to trace who accessed what when.

I will repeat the important link Medawar provides in text form at the end of this post to prevent messing with it. Here then is his post in its entirety for your consideration.

"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!

 There has been a successful Federal prosecution for this crime, details now released by the FBI. It is worth noting that this was effectively also a gangstalking case insofar as the primary defendant was found to have had help on the night when things progressed to the actual killing and, given the intensity of the stalking (and blackmail attempts) which preceded this, it's quite likely that he would have sought to share the workload before this.

(Note to police, FBI and NCA: if a victim is alleging offences that seem like an impossible amount of work for a single offender, you must give weight to the possibility of conspiracy and/or common purpose as well as that the victim is simply mistaken. The latter course will only reduce your workload and help your career if it is really true: if the victim turns out to be correct you've just blown away your career, reputation and pension. The safest course is to check for this kind of thing, because it's always going to be more common than suggested by official statistics (which are primarily designed to get your political bosses re-elected).

No mention is made of sentences for the two known accomplices, which may indicate either that they still face further local charges in Independence, Missouri, or that they felt the need to cut a deal with the Federal authorities. Had they been proved to have assisted with the cyber-stalking phase of the case, they could easily have faced the same penalty. 

This highlights the enormous risks being run by anyone playing even a minor role in stalking, gangstalking and cyber-stalking offences, because simply doing what you are told by the sort of person likely to become head of such a gang, you are making yourself legally responsible for the actions of someone not in their right mind!

There's more than one Federal law these days that can be used to prosecute such cases, depending largely on whether or not the abuse of computer technology was involved (bugs, spyware, tracking devices, and tracking apps on the victim's phone all count and not very many stalking gangs fail to use at least one of those!) Even when it's all done by word of mouth, it's still a conspiracy to deny rights and when that results in death (or kidnapping) the penalty can be life imprisonment or death, if the current administration is minded to permit the latter.

In the United Kingdom there is no such thing as a Federal crime; just varying degrees of severity or public interest which might divert a case from Crown or Sheriff's court to the Old Bailey or the Court of Sessions. But there is a an over-arching principle that participants in a conspiracy share responsibility for what the conspiracy does and there is also a law of Common Purpose, which requires even participants in a spontaneous offence to share responsibility for its outcome. Beyond that, a gang member can be and often is, charged with "assisting an offender in..." whatever the crime was. 

The cosy feeling of security in being a gang member or going along with workplace bullying is a legal illusion, because by doing so you make yourself responsible for the final outcome of that activity, however dreadful that might be. And the dreadfulness of the outcome is determined by the most psychopathic or sociopathic personality within the gang, or workplace. Everyone accosted by a bully or participant in a feud of any kind, needs to ask themselves the simple question: "what's the worst thing this person might do?" before doing anything that might help them do it.

There's probably at least a dozen followers in jail for every leader who managed to get himself jailed rather than letting someone else go to jail for him.

Bob Dylan: "don't follow leaders, who rob the parking meters!"

Update

 I've just added a small amount of additional and important information to my post titled "Response to Dr. Williams" here from earlier this year.

Muegge Murder Update

 My friend Medawar has a new blog post on the murder of Linda Muegge. This is a case both of us have been following closely from the beginning. Here is the link:

https://medawarscornflakes.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-murder-of-linda-muegge-who-was-frank.html

As he mentions, I have a much older post on the case that I have designed to be a reference for information on the case. He gives the link for my post:

https://vocct.blogspot.com/2010/12/muegge-murder.html 

"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!

 My friend Medawar has published a new post that I am sharing here with permission. I must point out that because this stuff is done primarily by computers and phones, law enforcement is able to trace who accessed what when.

I will repeat the important link Medawar provides in text form at the end of this post to prevent messing with it. Here then is his post in its entirety for your consideration.

"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!

 There has been a successful Federal prosecution for this crime, details now released by the FBI. It is worth noting that this was effectively also a gangstalking case insofar as the primary defendant was found to have had help on the night when things progressed to the actual killing and, given the intensity of the stalking (and blackmail attempts) which preceded this, it's quite likely that he would have sought to share the workload before this.

(Note to police, FBI and NCA: if a victim is alleging offences that seem like an impossible amount of work for a single offender, you must give weight to the possibility of conspiracy and/or common purpose as well as that the victim is simply mistaken. The latter course will only reduce your workload and help your career if it is really true: if the victim turns out to be correct you've just blown away your career, reputation and pension. The safest course is to check for this kind of thing, because it's always going to be more common than suggested by official statistics (which are primarily designed to get your political bosses re-elected).

No mention is made of sentences for the two known accomplices, which may indicate either that they still face further local charges in Independence, Missouri, or that they felt the need to cut a deal with the Federal authorities. Had they been proved to have assisted with the cyber-stalking phase of the case, they could easily have faced the same penalty. 

This highlights the enormous risks being run by anyone playing even a minor role in stalking, gangstalking and cyber-stalking offences, because simply doing what you are told by the sort of person likely to become head of such a gang, you are making yourself legally responsible for the actions of someone not in their right mind!

There's more than one Federal law these days that can be used to prosecute such cases, depending largely on whether or not the abuse of computer technology was involved (bugs, spyware, tracking devices, and tracking apps on the victim's phone all count and not very many stalking gangs fail to use at least one of those!) Even when it's all done by word of mouth, it's still a conspiracy to deny rights and when that results in death (or kidnapping) the penalty can be life imprisonment or death, if the current administration is minded to permit the latter.

In the United Kingdom there is no such thing as a Federal crime; just varying degrees of severity or public interest which might divert a case from Crown or Sheriff's court to the Old Bailey or the Court of Sessions. But there is a an over-arching principle that participants in a conspiracy share responsibility for what the conspiracy does and there is also a law of Common Purpose, which requires even participants in a spontaneous offence to share responsibility for its outcome. Beyond that, a gang member can be and often is, charged with "assisting an offender in..." whatever the crime was. 

The cosy feeling of security in being a gang member or going along with workplace bullying is a legal illusion, because by doing so you make yourself responsible for the final outcome of that activity, however dreadful that might be. And the dreadfulness of the outcome is determined by the most psychopathic or sociopathic personality within the gang, or workplace. Everyone accosted by a bully or participant in a feud of any kind, needs to ask themselves the simple question: "what's the worst thing this person might do?" before doing anything that might help them do it.

There's probably at least a dozen followers in jail for every leader who managed to get himself jailed rather than letting someone else go to jail for him.

Bob Dylan: "don't follow leaders, who rob the parking meters!"

Who is the Victim Here?--An Open Letter to My Adult Children and the World

It has come to my attention that my ex-husband and his associates are spreading the word far and wide that I "have spent over 20 years now being obsessed with getting back at him for leaving me for another woman and am crazy". The truth is that for over 20 years now I have been forced to defend myself from constant attacks, persecutions, illegal invasions of my privacy, and more from a clearly psychopathic ex-husband and that he is the one who is obsessed with ruining my life, torturing me in every way he can, and ultimately, killing me. This is what stalkers do when they are not stopped.

Outside of Central Texas and my ex-'s reach (which it should be noted is considerable), it has become well-known what is really going on here and who the true victim is. Here my ex- and his cronies are reduced to spreading lies as their only defense for the things they do that are otherwise indefensible. Within his sphere of influence, my ex- has no trouble persuading people to spread his lies; he is powerful, wealthy, well-connected, intelligent, and a skilled manipulator of people, as well as very scary to run afoul of. 

I have said it a million times and I will repeat it here again: it is a critical life skill for decent, honest, and thinking people to thoroughly check out the truthfulness of things they hear, read, or are told before they believe those things as fact and especially before they repeat them to others! Persons on the sociopathic spectrum and those who are too easily manipulated will never care about this, but I have to hope that the majority of people in this world do care and do understand that spreading lies, whether deliberately or accidentally, causes great harm and evil in the world. If you are not concerned with the moral issues of this, you should definitely be concerned with the practical issues of defaming an innocent person, like facing civil suits and/or criminal charges for slander, libel, and civil liberty violations. People who are being victimized by lies need our support and our care and definitely not our participation in this evil!

As we begin a new year, I ask everyone to thoroughly examine their own thinking and behavior. Are you really living the kind of morally upright life you want to live and being the kind of responsible person you want to be? For some, this might involve lifestyle changes equivalent to those made for losing weight or quitting smoking. I remind you too that our young children are watching our behavior and will tend to grow up mirroring their elders, so this is an important issue for other reasons as well.

As a postscript to this, I've added some truths in the post below that I have borrowed from my friend Kitty Hundal (with her kind permission). Kitty is also a long-term innocent victim of lies, persecution, stalking, harassment, and criminal acts.

Update: Shortly after I posted this, my ex- asked to have the following comment added to an older post of mine titled "Slasher". It's actually a perfect example of psychopathy and many of the "Truths" published in the post below this one.

I used to follow your blog. I was drugged and when I woke up 4 days later, I found a key and keychain on my key ring that wasn't mine. I feared for my life more than I had in several years considering I couldn't figure how or when they placed the unknown key on my keychain.

I sold my house and fled for my life!

Prior to that, they'd monitor what I watched and read on the Internet and your blog enabled them to leave a golf ball on my property and then they would bombard my neighbor with golf balls...perhaps out of confusion or intentionally as she'd often notice the creeps between our two houses.

Truths

 

 

RESPONSE TO MANAGERS FROM MEDAWAR

Background

 

I “Vocct”, the author of this blog, have worked the same two jobs for financial reasons for many years, both outside my chosen field/s because they were all I could get. One job, my primary one, is fairly close to where I live, but the secondary one is an hour’s drive from my house, half on a freeway and the other half on a back road, and often late at night. While making this drive over the years, there have been numerous frightening and dangerous incidents: rocks and rockets launched at my vehicle, tailgating (sometimes by large trucks and even by marked law enforcement vehicles!), items placed in the road, “brightings” (high headlight beams suddenly aimed at me), and MUCH more.

 

A few years ago, a single male manager at my primary job came under the influence of two women with ties to my ex-husband and property development near my house and land. The manager was dating one of these women at the time and worked very closely with the other on a daily basis. When he made some remarks to me indicating the women had been telling him things about me that weren’t true, I became concerned about possible effects on my job, and I shared these concerns in some private emails to my friend Medawar. I never discussed these matters with anyone else, either in writing or verbally.

 

A day or two after my email exchange with Medawar, the manager called me into his office and told me I should quit my job working under him and do the long-distance one full-time. When I questioned him about why he was saying this, it immediately became apparent that he’d somehow had access to my private emails. I was furious about this and immediately emailed Medawar to let him know.

 

Medawar quickly responded to me with an email containing an open letter to the manager. I printed this letter out in case I needed to give it to him, but without my saying anything to anyone, the next day fellow employees informed me that the manager was seen off by himself weeping. And two weeks later, the manager was suddenly gone, supposedly after accepting an early retirement package.

 

Since then, Medawar’s letter has remained in my private email and I have not shown my printed copy of it to anyone. Recently, however, I have been stopped from serving my employers and more especially their customers as well as I would have liked to. This reached the point where some customers have remarked that they see me being treated unfairly, though more customers are simply confused by the strange behavior of colleagues and a few “planted” non-customers towards me. Current managers at my primary job have now cut my work hours from full-time to part-time, which drastically cuts my benefits as well as my income. The managers have also informed me directly that they expect me to make up the missing work hours at my other job, meaning they want me driving more at night. I am an older female at a point in my life where natural age-related changes in the eyes begin to cause eye fatigue and increasing problems with vision at night, not to mention the physical and mental fatigue caused by working long hours at a very physically demanding job, facts the people trying to force me to be on the road so much are well aware of.

 

I am an important witness in several major ongoing criminal investigations, so my personal safety is a concern. That plus the terrible and completely unwarranted treatment at my primary job caused me to ask Medawar if I could post a redacted version of his original letter, since it had obviously been illegally accessed and read already, as a reminder and a warning . He agreed and then did me one better by updating it.

 

Here then are Medawar’s words of warning. I can only add that I am extremely grateful for the help and support they give.

 

 

Dear [Manager/s],

 

Your reported behavior indicates that you have been told more than one thing about [Vocct] that is not actually true (but very artfully contrived), and that you are acting in, whether you realize this or not, the interests of her ex-husband and his property-speculator buddies.

 

You may think, in a fit of self-righteous rage, that this does not matter and you can do it anyway: after all "it's not a Federal offence!" But actually it is, in two ways:

Reading [Vocct's] e-mail, such as this one, is a Federal Offence all by itself, albeit a relatively minor one.

 

But taking part in her ex-husband's psychotic schemes to harass and persecute [Vocct], with the probable ultimate aim, from [her ex-husband's] point of view at least, of causing her "accidental" demise at some point after years of misery, is a much more serious Federal offence called "Denial of Rights". See:

 

https://trac.syr.edu/laws/18/18USC00241.html

 

Just by taking part you are exposing yourself to a ten-year Federal jail term and notoriety that would make you unemployable in any responsible or rewarding position for life.

But, should the conspiracy achieve what [Vocct’s ex-husband] wants it to achieve, you and every other participant, which may include people you care for, would be eligible for a Federal Death sentence.

These have been carried out only very rarely throughout American history, but you currently enjoy the rule of a very direct-acting President who sees no reason whatsoever why Federal death penalties should not be applied where appropriate.

 

Most of [Vocct’s ex-husband's] accomplices are motivated by the (at this stage hypothetical) money they might make by appropriating [Vocct's] lawful property and developing it commercially. It is in the nature of this kind of conspiracy that it acts like a pyramid selling scheme and that kind of reward will have already been promised to far more individuals than there will be resources from which the rewards could be taken. This does not matter to [Vocct’s ex-husband] one jot, because he only needs the promise of money to get people to do his will, and his actual objective is [Vocct's] slow and painful destruction in a way that will profit no-one except him, and that not in any healthy way.

 

[Manager/s], this is your chance to not be one of [the ex-husband's] patsies and to not comprehensively destroy your own life in an impulsive attempt to "squash [Vocct] like a bug."

 

[Vocct’s ex-husband] and his buddies are skating on very much thinner ice than they think they are and there has been an open criminal intelligence file on him and one of his closest associates on the UK's Police National Computer system for a decade. By helping him, even in a small way, you will be volunteering for more trouble that you can comprehend to land on your head one fine day. The file is sitting there gathering information all the time, and that includes about everyone who helps [Vocct’s ex-husband] do what he does. (Which appears to include matters pertaining to commercially and technically-sensitive privileged information about offshore energy platform contracts in Scotland and serious crimes against the person in both England and Scotland. (He may never have been to Wales, but Wales and England have the same legal system, with local variation in individual laws and taxes as the Senned Cymru sees fit.))

 

[Vocct] has not taken anything from anyone, she is guilty only of having won about one tenth of a fair settlement from a divorce court, for a divorce in which she was a completely innocent and passive party.

 

This is your one and only chance not to be a twannock.

 

Medawar