Sunday, February 25, 2024

"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!

 My friend Medawar has published a new post that I am sharing here with permission. I must point out that because this stuff is done primarily by computers and phones, law enforcement is able to trace who accessed what when.

I will repeat the important link Medawar provides in text form at the end of this post to prevent messing with it. Here then is his post in its entirety for your consideration.

"Cyber Stalking Leading to Death" will get you life in jail!

 There has been a successful Federal prosecution for this crime, details now released by the FBI. It is worth noting that this was effectively also a gangstalking case insofar as the primary defendant was found to have had help on the night when things progressed to the actual killing and, given the intensity of the stalking (and blackmail attempts) which preceded this, it's quite likely that he would have sought to share the workload before this.

(Note to police, FBI and NCA: if a victim is alleging offences that seem like an impossible amount of work for a single offender, you must give weight to the possibility of conspiracy and/or common purpose as well as that the victim is simply mistaken. The latter course will only reduce your workload and help your career if it is really true: if the victim turns out to be correct you've just blown away your career, reputation and pension. The safest course is to check for this kind of thing, because it's always going to be more common than suggested by official statistics (which are primarily designed to get your political bosses re-elected).

No mention is made of sentences for the two known accomplices, which may indicate either that they still face further local charges in Independence, Missouri, or that they felt the need to cut a deal with the Federal authorities. Had they been proved to have assisted with the cyber-stalking phase of the case, they could easily have faced the same penalty. 

This highlights the enormous risks being run by anyone playing even a minor role in stalking, gangstalking and cyber-stalking offences, because simply doing what you are told by the sort of person likely to become head of such a gang, you are making yourself legally responsible for the actions of someone not in their right mind!

There's more than one Federal law these days that can be used to prosecute such cases, depending largely on whether or not the abuse of computer technology was involved (bugs, spyware, tracking devices, and tracking apps on the victim's phone all count and not very many stalking gangs fail to use at least one of those!) Even when it's all done by word of mouth, it's still a conspiracy to deny rights and when that results in death (or kidnapping) the penalty can be life imprisonment or death, if the current administration is minded to permit the latter.

In the United Kingdom there is no such thing as a Federal crime; just varying degrees of severity or public interest which might divert a case from Crown or Sheriff's court to the Old Bailey or the Court of Sessions. But there is a an over-arching principle that participants in a conspiracy share responsibility for what the conspiracy does and there is also a law of Common Purpose, which requires even participants in a spontaneous offence to share responsibility for its outcome. Beyond that, a gang member can be and often is, charged with "assisting an offender in..." whatever the crime was. 

The cosy feeling of security in being a gang member or going along with workplace bullying is a legal illusion, because by doing so you make yourself responsible for the final outcome of that activity, however dreadful that might be. And the dreadfulness of the outcome is determined by the most psychopathic or sociopathic personality within the gang, or workplace. Everyone accosted by a bully or participant in a feud of any kind, needs to ask themselves the simple question: "what's the worst thing this person might do?" before doing anything that might help them do it.

There's probably at least a dozen followers in jail for every leader who managed to get himself jailed rather than letting someone else go to jail for him.

Bob Dylan: "don't follow leaders, who rob the parking meters!"

Monday, January 1, 2024

Who is the Victim Here?--An Open Letter to My Adult Children and the World

It has come to my attention that my ex-husband and his associates are spreading the word far and wide that I "have spent over 20 years now being obsessed with getting back at him for leaving me for another woman and am crazy". The truth is that for over 20 years now I have been forced to defend myself from constant attacks, persecutions, illegal invasions of my privacy, and more from a clearly psychopathic ex-husband and that he is the one who is obsessed with ruining my life, torturing me in every way he can, and ultimately, killing me. This is what stalkers do when they are not stopped.

Outside of Central Texas and my ex-'s reach (which it should be noted is considerable), it has become well-known what is really going on here and who the true victim is. Here my ex- and his cronies are reduced to spreading lies as their only defense for the things they do that are otherwise indefensible. Within his sphere of influence, my ex- has no trouble persuading people to spread his lies; he is powerful, wealthy, well-connected, intelligent, and a skilled manipulator of people, as well as very scary to run afoul of. 

I have said it a million times and I will repeat it here again: it is a critical life skill for decent, honest, and thinking people to thoroughly check out the truthfulness of things they hear, read, or are told before they believe those things as fact and especially before they repeat them to others! Persons on the sociopathic spectrum and those who are too easily manipulated will never care about this, but I have to hope that the majority of people in this world do care and do understand that spreading lies, whether deliberately or accidentally, causes great harm and evil in the world. If you are not concerned with the moral issues of this, you should definitely be concerned with the practical issues of defaming an innocent person, like facing civil suits and/or criminal charges for slander, libel, and civil liberty violations. People who are being victimized by lies need our support and our care and definitely not our participation in this evil!

As we begin a new year, I ask everyone to thoroughly examine their own thinking and behavior. Are you really living the kind of morally upright life you want to live and being the kind of responsible person you want to be? For some, this might involve lifestyle changes equivalent to those made for losing weight or quitting smoking. I remind you too that our young children are watching our behavior and will tend to grow up mirroring their elders, so this is an important issue for other reasons as well.

As a postscript to this, I've added some truths in the post below that I have borrowed from my friend Kitty Hundal (with her kind permission). Kitty is also a long-term innocent victim of lies, persecution, stalking, harassment, and criminal acts.

Update: Shortly after I posted this, my ex- asked to have the following comment added to an older post of mine titled "Slasher". It's actually a perfect example of psychopathy and many of the "Truths" published in the post below this one.

I used to follow your blog. I was drugged and when I woke up 4 days later, I found a key and keychain on my key ring that wasn't mine. I feared for my life more than I had in several years considering I couldn't figure how or when they placed the unknown key on my keychain.

I sold my house and fled for my life!

Prior to that, they'd monitor what I watched and read on the Internet and your blog enabled them to leave a golf ball on my property and then they would bombard my neighbor with golf balls...perhaps out of confusion or intentionally as she'd often notice the creeps between our two houses.

Truths








































 


 

Wednesday, July 19, 2023

RESPONSE TO MANAGERS FROM MEDAWAR

Background

 

I “Vocct”, the author of this blog, have worked the same two jobs for financial reasons for many years, both outside my chosen field/s because they were all I could get. One job, my primary one, is fairly close to where I live, but the secondary one is an hour’s drive from my house, half on a freeway and the other half on a back road, and often late at night. While making this drive over the years, there have been numerous frightening and dangerous incidents: rocks and rockets launched at my vehicle, tailgating (sometimes by large trucks and even by marked law enforcement vehicles!), items placed in the road, “brightings” (high headlight beams suddenly aimed at me), and MUCH more.

 

A few years ago, a single male manager at my primary job came under the influence of two women with ties to my ex-husband and property development near my house and land. The manager was dating one of these women at the time and worked very closely with the other on a daily basis. When he made some remarks to me indicating the women had been telling him things about me that weren’t true, I became concerned about possible effects on my job, and I shared these concerns in some private emails to my friend Medawar. I never discussed these matters with anyone else, either in writing or verbally.

 

A day or two after my email exchange with Medawar, the manager called me into his office and told me I should quit my job working under him and do the long-distance one full-time. When I questioned him about why he was saying this, it immediately became apparent that he’d somehow had access to my private emails. I was furious about this and immediately emailed Medawar to let him know.

 

Medawar quickly responded to me with an email containing an open letter to the manager. I printed this letter out in case I needed to give it to him, but without my saying anything to anyone, the next day fellow employees informed me that the manager was seen off by himself weeping. And two weeks later, the manager was suddenly gone, supposedly after accepting an early retirement package.

 

Since then, Medawar’s letter has remained in my private email and I have not shown my printed copy of it to anyone. Recently, however, I have been stopped from serving my employers and more especially their customers as well as I would have liked to. This reached the point where some customers have remarked that they see me being treated unfairly, though more customers are simply confused by the strange behavior of colleagues and a few “planted” non-customers towards me. Current managers at my primary job have now cut my work hours from full-time to part-time, which drastically cuts my benefits as well as my income. The managers have also informed me directly that they expect me to make up the missing work hours at my other job, meaning they want me driving more at night. I am an older female at a point in my life where natural age-related changes in the eyes begin to cause eye fatigue and increasing problems with vision at night, not to mention the physical and mental fatigue caused by working long hours at a very physically demanding job, facts the people trying to force me to be on the road so much are well aware of.

 

I am an important witness in several major ongoing criminal investigations, so my personal safety is a concern. That plus the terrible and completely unwarranted treatment at my primary job caused me to ask Medawar if I could post a redacted version of his original letter, since it had obviously been illegally accessed and read already, as a reminder and a warning . He agreed and then did me one better by updating it.

 

Here then are Medawar’s words of warning. I can only add that I am extremely grateful for the help and support they give.

 

 

Dear [Manager/s],

 

Your reported behavior indicates that you have been told more than one thing about [Vocct] that is not actually true (but very artfully contrived), and that you are acting in, whether you realize this or not, the interests of her ex-husband and his property-speculator buddies.

 

You may think, in a fit of self-righteous rage, that this does not matter and you can do it anyway: after all "it's not a Federal offence!" But actually it is, in two ways:

Reading [Vocct's] e-mail, such as this one, is a Federal Offence all by itself, albeit a relatively minor one.

 

But taking part in her ex-husband's psychotic schemes to harass and persecute [Vocct], with the probable ultimate aim, from [her ex-husband's] point of view at least, of causing her "accidental" demise at some point after years of misery, is a much more serious Federal offence called "Denial of Rights". See:

 

https://trac.syr.edu/laws/18/18USC00241.html

 

Just by taking part you are exposing yourself to a ten-year Federal jail term and notoriety that would make you unemployable in any responsible or rewarding position for life.

But, should the conspiracy achieve what [Vocct’s ex-husband] wants it to achieve, you and every other participant, which may include people you care for, would be eligible for a Federal Death sentence.

These have been carried out only very rarely throughout American history, but you currently enjoy the rule of a very direct-acting President who sees no reason whatsoever why Federal death penalties should not be applied where appropriate.

 

Most of [Vocct’s ex-husband's] accomplices are motivated by the (at this stage hypothetical) money they might make by appropriating [Vocct's] lawful property and developing it commercially. It is in the nature of this kind of conspiracy that it acts like a pyramid selling scheme and that kind of reward will have already been promised to far more individuals than there will be resources from which the rewards could be taken. This does not matter to [Vocct’s ex-husband] one jot, because he only needs the promise of money to get people to do his will, and his actual objective is [Vocct's] slow and painful destruction in a way that will profit no-one except him, and that not in any healthy way.

 

[Manager/s], this is your chance to not be one of [the ex-husband's] patsies and to not comprehensively destroy your own life in an impulsive attempt to "squash [Vocct] like a bug."

 

[Vocct’s ex-husband] and his buddies are skating on very much thinner ice than they think they are and there has been an open criminal intelligence file on him and one of his closest associates on the UK's Police National Computer system for a decade. By helping him, even in a small way, you will be volunteering for more trouble that you can comprehend to land on your head one fine day. The file is sitting there gathering information all the time, and that includes about everyone who helps [Vocct’s ex-husband] do what he does. (Which appears to include matters pertaining to commercially and technically-sensitive privileged information about offshore energy platform contracts in Scotland and serious crimes against the person in both England and Scotland. (He may never have been to Wales, but Wales and England have the same legal system, with local variation in individual laws and taxes as the Senned Cymru sees fit.))

 

[Vocct] has not taken anything from anyone, she is guilty only of having won about one tenth of a fair settlement from a divorce court, for a divorce in which she was a completely innocent and passive party.

 

This is your one and only chance not to be a twannock.

 

Medawar

Saturday, March 4, 2023

Response to Dr. Williams: A More Complete Timeline

 Note: Discussions with my friend Medawar contributed significantly to this piece.

RESPONSE TO DR. WILLIAMS: A MORE COMPLETE TIMELINE

A recent issue of the local newspaper here contained a lengthy op-ed piece penned by Dr. Michael Williams, a former head of the local hospital, regarding the recent highly controversial sale of the hospital to the Methodist system and the behemoth HCA. In his piece, Dr. Williams gave quite a bit of good information on the history of the hospital in a timeline-type format—much more detail than I’ve previously seen anywhere else. However, the information he gave on a subject I happen to have considerable knowledge on doesn’t go nearly far enough in explaining both the relevant history of the hospital and what’s really going on. In fact, despite how lengthy and detailed his information is, I estimate that he has omitted at least two-thirds of the facts needed in order to truly understand what’s going on with this issue. I intend to fill in many of the gaps here.

I agree completely with Dr. Williams that in order to fully understand the situation with the local hospital, you do have to delve deeply into its history. The relevant history actually begins in 1973, when witnesses who were there at the time told me a man drove his pickup truck up to the entrance of the emergency room, got out, went inside, and announced without any discernible emotion, “The body is in the truck.” Upon hearing this, medical personnel rushed outside and opened the truck doors—to find no one there. But then they looked into the bed of the truck—and were shocked to see the nearly decapitated and obviously dead body of a teenage girl. It was the man’s daughter, and her body had been tossed into the back of the truck like a dead deer. At that point, a second pickup pulled up, driven by a new young police officer who happened to also be a close family friend of the man and his family. This officer immediately took charge of the situation. And so, the Great Cover-Up began, with the local hospital front and center right from the start.

You see, the father of the dead girl (and his father before him) was extremely well-connected politically and professionally, and for personal reasons, was also extremely desperate to cover up the truth about what had happened to his daughter. He was not himself the killer, but he knew who was, and the truth would have ruined him in his estimation. So he used every tool at his disposal: very high level connections, threats, lies, and more to make sure his version of the truth (that his daughter’s death happened later at the hospital after lifesaving measures were attempted and that the death was accidental) was the only one given out. Which could never completely work, given that this is a small town where gossip runs rampant, but he was absolutely determined to conceal the truth anyway, and so he did. The hospital and law enforcement at all levels were involved in the cover-up.

All of this told the girl’s actual killer that he could do anything he wanted to without fear of prosecution, so he began to do exactly that. Preventable tragedies began to spread outward like ripples in a pond. But this killer was highly intelligent as well as psychopathic. [Note from Medawar: Being a psychopath is an emotional handicap rather than a mental one.] The killer went off to college and medical school and became a doctor, after which of course he came back here to practice where he was a very big fish indeed. He learned to fly as well and obtained a pilot’s license and several planes, which caused the ripples to spread out even further. And, most importantly for the topic at hand, he became Chief of Staff at the hospital for many years (because, again, no one could or would touch him).

At some point this doctor and his friends realized that the biggest money of all could be made by building and opening, and most importantly, owning an ambulatory surgery center. This would be in direct competition with the local hospital though, and would siphon off most of the funds from the hospital, so the doctor and his friends began to run the hospital, which was non-profit and publicly owned, into the ground.

The doctor also became desperate to own the land the new ambulatory surgery center was to be built on because of the huge potential amounts of money to be made. This was when I began to be a big problem for him, because I owned the main tract near the hospital that was the perfect, and therefore the intended, site.

By 1999, plans for the new center must have been in full swing, because there had been a series of strange new incidents over the previous year or so (that I can’t go into right now). It was then that the second death critical to the hospital’s current situation took place. Because everything these days has become international, a very well-known and much-loved public figure from another country came to know about this area and, by virtue of having trained a young journalist who ran afoul of the local medical community and their friends in law enforcement and high-level politics by filing a malpractice suit, what was happening here. They either were, or were assumed to be, planning to publicize it all hugely because it would have been a major news story, but this never happened because the foreign public figure was shot to death in a brazen killing that was clearly done by a professional. This high-profile murder sent shock waves around the globe that still reverberate today.

Immediately after this killing, residents of at least one neighboring community and their small hospital began putting as much distance between themselves and the doctor and hospital here as possible, but rumors and quiet whispers were rampant. Then in the foreign country where the high-profile murder had taken place, a man who was obviously not guilty was arrested and charged with the killing. The minute he was arrested, the attempts to obtain my land either illegally or on the cheap began again, at first semi-seriously and, the moment the obvious patsy was convicted, in earnest [causing me to start this blog!].

This man spent several years wrongly incarcerated. Investigative journalists from the victim’s own organization became involved at the request of the wrongly-convicted man’s sister, and they eventually got his conviction overturned and him freed despite potentially contemptuous letters to three appeal court judges written by a different colleague of the victim instructing them to deny the appeal!

Also, immediately after the 1999 high-profile murder in the other country, people who owned property around me suddenly began dying under various suspicious circumstances. The first of these deaths that I know of was in or around 2000, the second was in 2001, and there were three in the first four months of 2003, one of which was the woman who lived on the place next to mine. She was shot execution-style, and her death was ruled a suicide despite there being two bullets in her head, not one.

Meanwhile, the man who had lost his daughter had been a driving force behind the local hospital almost from the start, and when he saw the entity he’d worked so hard for being run into the ground deliberately, he fought back. He had always made sure he controlled the hospital board and finances. Now he used his high-level connections and helped Dr. Williams, the new CEO who was already well-respected locally but without any ties to any clique, attract experts (production engineers as well as physicians) from the outside to run the hospital properly. They turned things around, and the hospital won awards and accolades under their tenure. They also purchased property a little further out of town with an eye toward expanding the hospital facilities in the future in a nearby and more easily accessible location that was more open and level and would allow more room for expansion.

But this was not to last. The man who’d lost his daughter in 1973 (who was no saint, by the way; he could be quite ruthless himself, but he had his reasons for keeping the hospital in good shape) became seriously ill and died in 2014. At which point all the people who’d done so much to improve the hospital were ousted and the hospital began to be run into the ground again. And low and behold! the focus was once again on the group of doctors (plus at least one local attorney and one local dentist) who still desperately wanted to start their own ambulatory surgical center that would compete with the hospital and siphon off the most profitable parts of its income into their personal pockets. Because the intent was to bleed the hospital dry financially, of course it needed to be sold off while it was still a going concern to make someone else take the losses. (No doubt the fact that the hospital is no longer locally owned and run but the new ambulatory surgical center is will be extremely well publicized, too!) It’s also worth noting in this regard that the hospital foundation, Wellness Center, Rehab Center, and other related entities that would not compete with the planned outpatient surgery facility were kept out of the recent sale of the hospital. And sure enough, I’m once again receiving ridiculously low offers for my property from all sorts of people, companies, and groups who all claim to have no connections whatsoever to the doctor and his friends, and the property intended for expansion is now slated for development as a subdivision instead.

My own hospital-related timeline complete for now, it’s time to talk about how to move forward—properly versus “business as usual”. The tragic truth is that the original lies and coverups starting at the local hospital back in 1973 have allowed a shocking number of additional homicides and other criminal acts to take place over many years that should never, ever have been allowed to happen. These truths are now public knowledge, so continuing to try and deny them only makes the whole situation worse. And the inescapable truth is that the hospital here is now forever tied to what is probably the most high-profile murder case of the late twentieth century—by the same person who is now behind the undermining of the hospital for personal profit—and that this fact is widely known both here and abroad where the crime took place. And because countries tend to get upset when persons from outside their borders come in and execute their most popular citizens, you can bet they’re never going to stop seeking justice. In fact, there continues to be an open and active investigation into this particular homicide that has already cost that country the equivalent of millions of dollars. There are no statutes of limitations on murder cases there, either, so all law enforcement has to do is sit back and wait until it’s politically expedient to make their move. Personally, I wouldn’t want that hanging over my head and the preventable deaths and serious crimes that were never stopped to be on my conscience.

I say it’s time to start being proactive: to tell the whole story connected with the local hospital, not just part of it; to put a stop to all the wrongdoing, not just the most convenient parts; and to demand a complete accounting of exactly what was paid for our hospital and exactly who gets (or gets control of) that money, down to the last penny. Whether you like it or not, the whole world really is watching.

 

Thursday, October 14, 2021

How To Cope With Organized Stalking

My good friend Medawar has recently posted an important piece on organized stalking to his blog that I am reprinting here in its entirety with his permission. It's a really good introductory overview.

I would only add to his discussion of lies with regard to organized stalking that I consider it a critical life skill to check out the accuracy of things you are told before you believe them and especially before you repeat them to anyone else. As Medawar points out, lies are a basic part of organized stalking because they can be so incredibly damaging. Sociopaths and psychopaths are very aware that most people are too lazy or clueless to actually verify information being given to them. 

Here then is Medawar's post:

TUESDAY, 12 OCTOBER 2021

How to Cope with Organised Stalking: an open letter to Chris Packham

 It is apparent from the latest of several news items over the past few years, that the wildlife campaigner and broadcaster Chris Packham has fallen victim to what can only honestly be described as organised stalkers. This makes him an involuntary member of a club with very wide membership ranging from campaigners with views similar to his own, to those who are diametrically opposed and a rather larger number of people who have no idea at all why they are being persecuted. This post, while not comprehensive (or it would be far too long for anyone to read) sets out to offer some useful observations and tips for Mr Packham or anyone else, whatever their views on any matter, who finds themself in a similar position.

Don't be too concerned with discovering or speculating about your stalker's motives:

There are a few reasons for this advice. First and foremost, stalking and all other forms of targetted persecution are wrong, always wrong, and there is no cause, however urgent, however noble, which cannot disgrace and destroy itself by resorting to this kind of tactic. Recognising that stalking is always wrong and can never be justified is an important part of the solution, because it allows you to make common cause with those whom you might otherwise reject and bitterly oppose and it puts your persecutors on a collision course with the rest of the human race and, if you care to believe it, greater forces than that.

Secondly, Medawar once asked a psychiatrist why people were prepared to take part in stalking campaigns and the immediate and unequivocal response was "because they enjoy it." Everything Medawar has learned about stalking in the twenty years since that interview has supported that simple statement from the psychiatrist. Stalking doesn't just destroy the victim: it destroys those causes in whose name stalking is employed. Former members of the campaign group "Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty" believe they were defeated by a conspiracy between the government and "Big Pharma" but the harsh truth is that their methods, and the stalking of individuals and families in particular, turned pretty well the whole country against them and anyone who even sounded like them. There is no gain for the cause in the resort to stalking. Organised stalking, just like lone stalking, is done purely for the enjoyment of those organising it and those carrying it out. Your beliefs and your causes only really matter to them because they matter to you, allowing them to gain sadistic pleasure from frustrating your campaigns and destroying your hopes. Stalking is always about destroying hope in the end, because that's what gives a sadist the biggest thrill.

Consider, for a moment, that many victims of organised stalking have no history of activism at all; sometimes the trigger is amazingly trivial, almost always it involves the victim doing something he or she had a perfect right to do. Your beliefs, and the apparent beliefs of your persecutors, are usually not the real reason it is happening. There is nothing to be gained from compromising your beliefs, "toning them down" or doing anything other than regularly checking that you are happy in your own heart and mind with what you are doing. Artists are stalked, not usually to suppress any political message in their work, but because destroying their creativity gives the stalkers the thrill of cutting off a butterfly's wings, magnified a thousand times. The only satisfactory solution to stalking is to expose the stalkers and stop the stalking. Scuttling for cover is not only cowardly, but utterly futile.

And this brings us to an important observation based on more than two decades experience of these matters:

Lies Are A Stalker's Most Powerful Weapon (and thereby the most addictive)

Sometimes, lies are all a stalking campaign consists of, but more often they are used to complement and enable all the threats, vandalism, cruelty to pets and recreational arson which constitute the more obvious threat. Stalkers will spread lies about the victim, often before they notice anything amiss, to distance and then slowly isolate them from friends, neighbours and even family members. Those lies will also lie there waiting for a police investigation to start, which will always involve discreet inquiries amongst the victim's friends, neighbours and relatives -and the planted lies will be designed to cancel or fatally misdirect the police investigation in pretty short order. This is the major reason why victims frequently end up believing that the police are complicit in their stalking: the stalkers have carefully laid "evidence" for the police to unearth, perhaps long before the stalking appeared to start and the first complaint to the police is filed.

But because lies are so powerful and effective, stalkers come to depend on them and that can create a contradiction which suddenly collapses the house of cards. 

Note to policemen reading this: if everyone around the victim believes something that he doesn't think is true, try tracing that belief back to its source. Lots of people believing the same (bizarre and/or defamatory?) thing is actually unnatural: threat this phenomena with due suspicion.

The stalkers will lie to the victim, in that almost every bit of physical evidence they leave behind for them to find will be misleading in some way. Look for a pattern behind the pattern: "What are they trying to make me think? Is it something designed to drive a wedge between me and the police, or somebody else that I depend on?"

The stalkers will lie to campaigners and activists who might oppose the victim, in order to get them to help with the stalking. Perhaps without them ever realising how much has been happening and just how harmful it is.

Stalking is unrequited murder

Anything that speaks of a high, noble or political agenda behind the stalking is also a lie: noble aims do not need to be pursued by methods such as this. They are doing it because slowly destroying someone by stalking gives them a thrill akin to murder without the legal risks. There is a great danger for the whole of society in the police treating stalking and harassment as a trivial issue, not worthy of their precious resources, because the perception of risk is the only thing which separates the stalker from the murderer and current, dismissive, police attitudes are steadily eroding that risk.

Try and count your persecutors (at least approximately) before you spend undue effort identifying them

You should keep a log of everything that happens throughout the staking and harassment in any case: the police advise this, even if they are disposed to ignore the results if it suits them. But enhance the data by always suffixing an estimate of the minimum number of persons required to do it. Also always suffix how far away you were from home when it happened.

Over time, those two metrics can be a very useful tool for identifying your persecutors and may one day give you peace of mind, if the right number of stalkers are brought to justice or at least exposed. 

A small number of stalkers operating mostly in your local area may imply that it's a couple of mates (or brothers) and that all their communication with each other is face to face or by direct phone call, so they don't need social media for any purpose except adding to the pressure on you. 

A large number, operating almost everywhere you go, implies a group or network with some form of shared communication which the authorities might be able to penetrate.

And so on. Those two metrics will make your harassment log or diary more useful to the authorities, always assuming that they see the need to take genuine action. Which is constantly being demanded by successive Home Secretaries and ignored by successive Chief Police Officers.


Thursday, July 29, 2021

Illegal Airstrip

See the following letter to the editor, published in the 6/23/21 issue of the Fredericksburg Standard:

The property this airstrip is on is either owned or very close to property owned by the serial killer I've discussed in my last couple of posts and/or his family. He is known to fly all over the country and all over the world to commit his crimes, so if I lived close to this airstrip, I'd be keeping a log of activity at this airstrip: dates, times, descriptions of aircraft, and whether flying in or out. After all, justice trumps revenge.

This is another example of how certain persons can and do get away with literally anything around here because of their high-level connections. It is NOT acceptable!