Friday, May 14, 2021

Let The Girls Speak!!

I'm so glad the parents of these victims had a chance to speak out! (See the article below from the Fredericksburg Standard, 12/2/2020.) However, it's even more important to let the victims themselves speak: through proper, accurate, and truthful investigations, crime scene examinations, and autopsies. [continued below]

But wait!--this is being prevented by deliberately not releasing any of this information at all. (See below, also from the Fredericksburg Standard, this time on 12/23/20.)

Thing is, there's been a known serial killer living in this community for years. And his probable first victim, almost 50 years ago, was another 16-year-old girl whose murder was also never properly investigated and whose story was hushed up because the killer's prominent family was desperate to conceal the crime and powerful people saw a opportunity to own and control them.

I have learned a lot about this particular killer over the years and would like to make a few predictions about what might actually be in the investigation file for these recent homicides:

1)  There is a good chance the murders occurred somewhere else.

2)  There is a good chance multiple perpetrators were involved. (As my friend Medawar likes to say, psychopaths have little trouble finding each other.) However, the actual killer will be the same man.

3)  The injuries to the victims will show medical knowledge.

4)  The crime scene or scenes will show extensive knowledge of law enforcement and investigative procedures.

5)  The injuries to the victims and the crime scenes (actual and/or staged) will show signs of the theatrical. This murderer is known to kill to stories in his head.

6)  At some point, it's highly likely that officers and agents from the Texas Rangers, FBI, and/or Secret Service will suddenly provide additional evidence pointing away from the actual killer (and usually toward some patsy or other). Some of these agents are known to live for free in housing provided by the killer's family. 

7)  There is involvement in both this and the Linda Muegge murder of the fire department, which I believe will turn out to be significant.

8)  There is a good chance for eventual justice in this case. International law enforcement has been actively investigating this killer for some time in connection with some high profile homicide cases, and these investigations are simply not going to go away, much as many here would wish.

With most of the community actively covering up for the serial killer in their midst, the entities below come off at best as total disconnects and at worst as very sick jokes... [continued below]

(Fredericksburg Standard 3/31/2021)

(Fredericksburg Standard 12/9/2020)

Let me be very clear: no one knows better than I do about how badly help for victims of domestic violence is needed here. However, if you just treat the symptoms of the problem without doing anything about the root cause, you're covering a huge, gaping, and constantly draining open wound with a pretty, pink, and frilly band-aid, meaning the problems will continue to get worse. You simply can't condemn one form of violence (domestic) while openly accepting, and at times even celebrating. another (serial killer). It's a culture of violence, and it continues to actively breed itself here because so one stops it.


Monday, March 1, 2021

How Things Work

How things work #1:

The following official city notice was published in The Fredericksburg Standard-Radio Post recently, but not in the normal spot with the other notices; this one was published in the sports section. Also notice that it was published right at the end of the year, when many people were either gone or busy with the holiday season.

If you plug the address given for the property in question into Google Maps, you get a location in the middle of the local public high school parking lot.

Planned uses for the property in question include everything but the kitchen sink. (Oh wait, one of those planned businesses might just sell those too!)

The brand new city mayor is also a realtor and a property developer. (He happens to share grandchildren with my ex-husband who, along with his brother, is also a property developer.) Another coincidence: one of the persons listed here shares the same last name as one of the main families behind the large organized stalking ring that is based in the San Antonio area.

How things work #2:

The following letter to the editor of The Kerrville Daily Times provides an explanation for why I don't expect to be able to receive a vaccine for Covid19 any time soon.


Thursday, July 16, 2020

How Can Organised Stalkers Afford to Do It?

My friend Medawar has posted a new piece that has important implications for Central Texas as well; he even alludes directly to the situation here if you know what to look for. I am reprinting the entire post here with his permission.


How Can Organised Stalkers Afford to Do It?

The simple answer to a question which has perplexed victims and investigators of organised stalking for years is easily answered by the video below:

They can afford to stalk because they use someone else's money, and if you own shares in a big dotcom company, that money could well be yours!

The video also leaves those psychiatrists and policemen who argue that organised stalking never actually happens and that all the victims are deluded, with no place to hide except behind their own wall of baseless denial. 

However, the conspiracy theorists who claim that the involvement of big corporations in organised stalking is proof of a massive super-conspiracy may also be missing the point: 

There was a conspiracy in this case, between a fairly high-ranking executive who instigated it all because he felt the victims had affronted him personally by criticising E-bay, and other employees who appear to have enjoyed being ordered to persecute the victims, but who probably had no easy choice but to comply with the executive in any case. The stalking was not company policy and it definitely was not in the interests of the company or the shareholders, who may yet lose substantial monies from this. 
The explanation for this and probably most organised stalking that takes place in the world (no explanation ever covers every case!) is that the sort of sociopath who is moved to sadistically persecute and destroy innocent people for some perceived slight (which is rarely substantial), tends to seek positions of power that he can abuse. Just as paedophiles seek positions where they have control of children, such as in social services or residential education. In fact the mentalities are so similar that Medawar is confident that a fair proportion of the people directing organised stalking will also be paedophiles because that's the sort of personality that will be involved.

And because it is so important to them to occupy a position of power, they incline to extreme reactions whenever they, in that prestigious position, encounter opposition, criticism, or just unwelcome facts.

If the case in the video is what can happen when a sociopath has a position in an organisation with as little involvement in covert operations as E-Bay (it wasn't even the notorious Facebook or YouTube!) what do readers suppose might happen if the same sort of sociopath has a senior position in the police, or the FBI, or the CIA, or even your local hospital? Do the senior positions at the local Masonic Lodge actually go to the most upright and trustworthy men, which is what is supposed to happen, or to those driven to attain such positions by their own vanity, who are the ones most likely to turn the collective resources of the Lodge against those who, wittingly or unwittingly, prick their vanity?  

The other characteristic of organised stalking very clearly seen in this case is that the immediate reaction to possible discovery was not flight or denial, but a coordinated effort to frame other people for the crime.

One afterthought is this: given the reasoning laid out above, wouldn't it make a lot of sense if the Chinese Communist Party had been colonised by all the sociopaths in China? Officials being terrified of having to tell the truth, critics being suppressed with ridiculous levels of force, an institutionalised refusal to admit any fault or error whatsoever in any circumstances! Medawar has read a novel which advances just this theory.

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Even MORE Issues of Trust

On 6/29/09, I posted a piece on this blog titled "Family Business" in which I gave detailed information about my family situation.

On 6/29/10, I posted a piece here titled "Pages" in which I documented my experiences with a fraudulent trust document that I was able to later have voided by the court. This document was a clear attempt to steal my house and land, which were the main assets I had been awarded in my 2001 divorce settlement. There are numerous other references to and documentation of this document and the circumstances surrounding it all over this blog.

On 10/27/09, I posted a piece (also on this blog) titled "Insurance Matters #1" in which I documented what I knew and didn't know at the time about four mysterious life insurance policies that had suddenly turned up.

Now I am posting a statement I've written for law enforcement that documents what I know and don't know about another clearly fraudulent trust document that I've been attempting to deal with. This second fraudulent trust document is definitely tied to the four mysterious life insurance policies plus additional life insurance policies I've learned about recently.

If, like the first, this second fraudulent trust document has anything at all to do with another attempt to steal my house and land, it will put anyone in any way connected with it squarely in the middle of a very high-profile homicide investigation. There's no statute of limitations on murder cases, so this investigation will continue quietly in the background, even if the well-connected perpetrators are once again able to prevent current prosecutions. Due to its high-profile nature and several other factors I can't go into here, this investigation will never end until justice is obtained. And anyone caught on the wrong side of it can expect to be utterly ruined and/or incarcerated at any moment. Consider yourselves warned!

Here then is my statement of the facts as I know them here and now. I can provide copies with the redacted information included upon request by persons or entities who are entitled to receive it. The homicide investigation has already been provided with a complete preliminary copy of this plus some additional information that is not included here.


My name is XXXXXXXXXX. I was born in XX in 19XX. I have previously also lived in XX, KY, and Houston, TX. I currently live in [Central Texas].

I married XXXXXXXXXX in Houston in 19XX. We had 3 children together, the oldest born in Houston and the other two after we moved to [Central Texas], where [my ex-] is from, in June of 1986. In June of 1999 [I believe this date to be important], [my ex-] suddenly left.

Our divorce was full of signs of fraud, but I was unable to obtain proper legal representation because my (now deceased) former father-in-law, XXXXXXXXXX, was a wealthy and powerful attorney, banker, and real estate developer with close connections to LBJ and the Bushes. I managed as best I could, and our divorce was finalized [at the beginning of] 2001. The house I currently reside in on [XXXXX] St. and the approximately 23 acres of land it sits on were the primary assets I received in the divorce settlement.

In Nov. or Dec. of 2001, I received change of address forms from MetLife for four life insurance policies I knew nothing about: #XXXX, #XXXX, #XXXX, and #XXXX. Apparently, correspondence related to these policies had been going to our former residence in Houston, TX, and possibly also to a former residence on XXXXX St. in [Central Texas] that we rented briefly while the house on XXXX was being built. I filled out the forms to update the addresses to my current residence. Then for the next several years, I received small dividend checks (each for less than $100, if I remember correctly). I cashed these and tried repeatedly to obtain information about the policies from MetLife, both by phone and by letter, but no one would ever tell me anything or get back to me. I asked my accountant, XXXXXXX, and my financial advisor, XXXXXXX, to help me with this, and both told me they couldn’t find out anything about the policies either. Eventually, the checks stopped coming.

I assumed at the time that these policies were ones my ex-husband had taken out on my life without my knowledge. Shortly after we moved to [Central Texas], while we were living in the rental house (Nov. of 1986), my daughter, my unborn child, and I nearly died from CO poisoning caused by tampering with the ventilation system in our attic and the door to our gas heater being left open. At the time, I was told these had been done by the previous tenant, but after my divorce, bizarre behavior on the part of my ex- and persistent rumors around town about my ex- being dangerous had caused me to come to the belief that the incident had been an attempt on our lives and that the four insurance policies had been related to this.

My house and land are located only a block or two from the local hospital, XXXXXXXXXX. Soon after my divorce, the City of XXXXXXX annexed my property. They then both raised my property taxes hugely and began trying to take away my agricultural exemption. They also never informed me that my agricultural land did not have to be annexed.

I hired a P.I. to help me deal with this and other very frightening issues of harassment, trespassing, and illegal surveillance that were going on. Instead of helping me, the P.I. defrauded me and someone forged my initials on an obviously fraudulent trust document that gave the P.I. total control of my property. A certified document examiner, XXXXXXXXXX, provided evidence that my initials on the document were forged, and I filed complaints against the P.I. that resulted in his license being revoked. After the P.I. died of cancer, his family cooperated with me in getting the fraudulent trust revoked.

After I was defrauded again, this time by P.I.s posing as former DEA and FBI agents, I began writing a blog about my experiences at One of my posts there is about the four MetLife policies and explains what I knew about them at the time.

I heard nothing more about the MetLife policies until early in 2018, when I suddenly began receiving repeated requests from MetLife to change my address on the policies to that of my father, XXXXXXXXXX, of Louisville, KY. Shortly after my divorce had been finalized, I had learned that my father and stepmother, XXXXXXXXXX, were actually close associates of my ex-husband and his family. After they stole house keys from me and gave them to my ex-, I had severed all ties with them, so I didn’t know what to make of these attempts to illegally change my address. Each time, I returned the change of address forms to MetLife telling them that my address had not changed and that for important legal reasons, I could not say that it had.

After five or six rounds of these attempted address changes, I received a letter from my father in which he personally asked me to okay the address changes and said the policies were actually his. I wrote back stating once again that I couldn’t lie about my address. I then received a second letter from my father that was more strongly worded and frankly ugly. I wrote him back explaining my position again. I also sent a copy of his letters and my responses to MetLife and asked for their help in stopping the change of address forms.

MetLife responded by sending me a letter stating that the four insurance policies were my father’s and were in some sort of trust that I was the trustee of. They also sent me a copy of a document my father had provided them with concerning this trust that stated in my father’s handwriting that I was the trustee of the trust that owned the policies. I noticed that this trust appeared to have been set up in Nov. of 1984, a few weeks after my mother had died of cancer.

I knew nothing whatsoever about this trust. I wrote to my father again, this time explaining that I could not serve as trustee of a trust I knew nothing about. While I was trying to decide what I should do about it, another letter arrived from my father. This time, he informed me that he was dying of cancer and that he wanted my stepmother to be named trustee of the trust in my place. He also said the trust left two-thirds of all it contained to my [sibling], XXXXXXXXXX of Louisville, and one-third to me, and he indicated that this was what he wanted.

Shortly after that (in Aug. of 2018), my three adult children and I received packets of documents from my stepmother’s lawyer in KY, XXXXXXXXXX, along with letters from [same attorney] asking us to sign and notarize the documents, which made [my step-mother] trustee of the trust in my place. These packets contained copies of a partial trust document, but it was incomplete (e.g., the section on what was contained in the trust was missing) and contained forged initials of my father’s and a forged signature of mine.

My eldest daughter and I refused to sign the documents until we were provided with more information. [The attorney] emailed that he was attaching a more complete copy of the trust document, but there was nothing attached. I emailed him back about this, and he responded by emailing a different trust document; this one was also incomplete and contained more forgeries. [My step-mother’s attorney] stated that he had some sort of court hearing scheduled on the matter and that my father was near death, so the matter was urgent. He also made various legal statements in his emails that were conflicting and occasionally even false. I emailed back that I simply could not ever sign off on a trust that I believed to be fraudulent. He then sent me a form he wanted me to sign saying simply that I resigned as trustee. I told him I could not do this either. He threatened me with unspecified legal action.

On Sept. 12, 2018, [the attorney] emailed to say that my father had died the day before. He urged me to begin filing claims on the insurance policies in order to get the money to my [sibling]. He also offered to assist me in obtaining copies of my father’s death certificate. I obtained a copy of my father’s death certificate on my own and filed a claim, but under my own name, in accordance with my father’s stated wishes from his letters. I then emailed [my sibling] (from whom I’d also been estranged for many years because my father had supported them financially and they had made it clear that their loyalties were with him and my ex-husband) to find out how they wanted to receive any money we were awarded in the claim. As far as I could tell, there was around $15,000 total left in the four policies.

MetLife sent me a letter back asking me to resubmit the claim with a tax # for the trust. I did resubmit the claim, but again it was under my own name and without the tax #, which of course I know nothing about. On Oct 26, 2018, I received a call from XXXXXXX at MetLife (XXX-XXX-XXXX) saying they couldn’t process the claim without a copy of the trust document. I explained that I’d been unable to obtain a complete and notarized copy of the document despite repeated attempts and that I believed the trust to be fraudulent. I also gave her [my step-mother’s lawyer’s] contact information. [The MetLife agent] called me back to say they were getting the run-around from him as well and that they were still trying to get a copy of the actual document. [The MetLife agent] promised to provide me with a copy of this if they were able to obtain it. I have never heard back from them.

Also in Oct. of 2018, someone (I think at the XXXXXXX Agency in Louisville?) forwarded me a small amount of information on a life insurance policy of my father’s with MassMutual, #XXXX, that had been issued in 1949 along with a dividend check for $42.28 that was made out to the “[my name] Ttee Under Irrev T/A Dtd 11-27-84”. I cashed the check under my own name and sent immediately sent two-thirds of it to my sibling as per my father’s wishes. My sibling emailed me with their thanks and mentioned having seen other life insurance policies of our father’s. Letters I received copies of dated Sept. 6 and Sept. 27, 2019 from Minnesota Life Insurance Co. mention an unknown claim #XXXX filed by XXXXXXX of Louisville, KY with regard to a policy #XXXX and ask [this person] for Certification of Trustee Authority and a Beneficiary Statement. I know nothing about this policy or claim and have no idea who [this person] is.

MetLife now says they intend to transfer all funds remaining in my father’s four policies with them to the Texas unclaimed property department. My sibling has been emailing me repeatedly, begging me to file insurance claims to get them the money from those and unknown additional life insurance policies of my father’s.

In one of the emails I received from [my step-mother’s lawyer] after my father had died, he stated that my step-mother would be moving to Ohio to be near her daughter. However, on Oct. 30, 2019, I accidentally discovered that a few weeks after my father’s death, my step-mother had actually moved not only to the same Central Texas town I live in, but to a residence on the hill directly above my house and land (where my adult daughter and I still live). She has been living there ever since.

Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Swans and Mills/Secrets and Rumors

(Yes, I'm back.)

Both of the following articles are from the Fredericksburg Standard.

If you don't want to have to worry about having dark secrets that can potentially cause catastrophic ruin and/or the rumor mill to run amok, then don't do, allow, or cover up the things that allow these to happen. Just sayin'.

Thursday, October 5, 2017

A Second Look At "Dirty Tricks"


It has been five years almost to the day since my friend Medawar wrote the following piece about my adult daughter and me. Now there are three different reasons, all of them very important, for why I need to re-post it.

The first of these reasons has to do with all of the information that is now coming out about the known attacks on U.S. diplomatic personnel (which includes U.S. spies, apparently) in Cuba. As you read the piece, you will quickly see why Medawar believes these attacks were carried out by Russia rather than Cuba; I tend to agree. (Tellingly, the U.S. Government is currently only formally accusing Cuba of failing to protect U.S. diplomats.) However, by virtue of what is being done to my daughter and me, I would add that at least some of this technology is also clearly in the hands of international organized crime. 

The two remaining reasons for my reposting of this piece will need to wait until the end, so read on...


Bringing The Dirty Tricks Back Home

I am the subject of a brand new piece posted by my friend Medawar on his blog "Medawar's Cornflakes".  I'm posting a copy of the article here in its entirety as well, with his permission.

My now-adult children and I are deeply grateful to Medawar and others who are actively publicizing our situation and attempting to help us.


Medawar has written this article on behalf of the blog owner at "Victims of Organized Crime in Central Texas", who is currently being harassed very intensely, in part to stop her telling her story in public, but mainly to prevent her making effective preparations for what may be a crucial court hearing in the middle of October. The court hearing is part of a long-running attempt by a property developer and attorney in Fredericksburg, Texas, to deprive the blog owner of her home. Some of those assisting and advising on the harassment, are former Secret Service agents who live in houses provided for them, on very generous terms, by the same property developer. They are breaking not only State and Federal laws, but also their oaths, and they are doing so in order to deny an innocent and law-abiding citizen precisely the thing they have been rewarded with for their connivance: a home. Throughout their careers, they were paid a reasonable salary and they now enjoy pensions secured by the taxpayer (those who made their living in the private sector seldom have a completely secure pension fund...) A heavily subsidized house is a thick layer of icing on the cake for those who were already set for a much more comfortable retirement than most Americans can expect.

Some of the harassment which "VOCCT" suffers from will be familiar to almost anyone who's found themselves in the way of a crooked property developer: tailgating, "brighting" and other forms of aggressive driving directed at them every time they drive to work, try and run essential errands, or simply visit family and friends. Constant intrusion onto the property and daily vandalism, too, will be familiar to those whose property is coveted by a developer, or whose homes happen to overlook the preferred pitch of the local drugs pusher. It's that there's big money at stake for the developer (less so for VOCCT, who merely aspires to live a blameless life in her own home) and he has, over his whole adult life, accumulated contacts, henchmen and favours, which he and his sons are cashing in to make this everyday harassment as intense as it possibly could be. And then there is the extra special thing, the enhanced harassment only available to a crook who has ex Secret Servicemen, FBI Agents and even Texas Rangers, in his pocket.

When Medawar first made contact with VOCCT, she and her adult daughter were most worried by the fact that people they met in Fredericksburg would pointedly refer to things they had done in conditions of strict privacy, such as the bathroom, or quiet, private conversations they had had in their kitchen. They believed that not only were the people harassing them extensively bugging the house, but that illegal video surveillance had been embedded in the structure of the house -and that choice images and footage from this was being made available to their neighbours and staff at businesses they frequented. Some of the individuals who appeared to have seen bathroom footage were clearly inclined towards sexual predation as well as voyeurism, and this added real fear of sexual violence to humiliation and embarrassment. (Anyone who has studied methods by which the KGB and Stasi used to harass dissidents, will recognize this trick. And they will recognize one or two more before this article is done.)

Medawar provided VOCCT with a straightforward RF detector (which cost about £89 at the time) intended mainly for locating bugs and hidden cameras. It is essentially a low gain receiver, and the gain can be turned even lower, so that it only normally responds when it is within a couple of feet of a radio frequency transmitter, such as a bug, wireless webcam, or a more professional video bug. By then turning the gain down, the source can be located to within inches. This device allowed VOCCT to provide Medawar with a set of architect's plans of her house, with little coloured dots to show RF sources all over the house. Not only were these very numerous, with several in each bath or shower room, but there was an absolute Babel of transmission modes, transmission bands and other characteristics, suggesting that several technological generations of illegal surveillance devices were present, and still active, all over the house and its outbuildings. There also turned out to be covertly-performed structural modifications in the loft and elsewhere, apparently intended to allow intruders access to the loft from the porch roof, and from the loft to other spaces between rooms and behind fixtures, all over the upper floor.

At the same time, it became apparent that a crawl space into the basement had been engineered to allow intruders free rein there, before the ground floor and its fixtures, blank spaces and piping runs, too. But the most pertinent point in this instance is this: in late 2010 and early 2011, it was possible to pick all of these point RF sources out from the background: they did not trigger the detector unless it was fairly close and the gain turned up.

In the past couple of months, VOCCT has complained of failing health as well as intensified harassment, at home and everywhere she goes to earn her living or run errands. She also discovered a discarded instruction leaflet for some high-power Radio-related equipment on her land.

Medawar advised her to see if she could use her detector to trace any new radio signal to a possible point of origin. At which point, VOCCT discovered that the radio frequency environment inside her house and indeed throughout the surrounding property, had changed from lots of discrete, locatable low to medium power point sources, to an all-pervasive, very high amplitude field of radio frequency signals, which didn't seem to decline in strength on any side of the house, or, indeed, on any side of the pasture associated with it. This is very unusual indeed.

There is a cellphone tower not far away, but this was already there and fully operational when VOCCT mapped out all of the point sources, now completely blanketed by the new signal field, and in any case, the signal strength from the tower would be strongest on the near side and much weaker immediately in the lee of what is a large stonebuilt house. (When it was possible to map individual signals, the cellphone tower signals were detectable mainly in the loft and roofspace.) Such an all-pervasive and strong RF field has been seen before, in the United States Embassy in Moscow, between 1965, when various American intelligence services and the Secret Service first discovered it, and 1976, when they finally allowed a fuss to be made about it, at which point it disappeared as mysteriously as it had started.

Because they had no idea what the signals in the Embassy were meant to accomplish, the CIA and the Secret Service (who had to be consulted about the Ambassador's safety) actually shared their findings with pretty well all US Intelligence agencies and several allied ones, because they wanted to know if the same thing was happening in other Embassies, and whether anyone knew what it was.

As far as Medawar knows, the Canadians, West Germans, French, Australian and British intelligence agencies were told about the basic problem. Medawar doesn't think that such strong signals were found at the British Embassy. At the time, this was housed in a rather majestic town house overlooking the Kremlin, so if the signals were caused by the Russians, as seemed probable, and were considered harmful, one would expect a building overlooking the Kremlin to be exempt. If, however, as the US Intelligence community told their own Embassy staff, the signals were merely there to activate physically harmless listening devices, there was no special reason for them to be absent from the British Embassy.

As well as Britain's overseas intelligence agency the SIS aka "MI6", the CIA's James Anderton consulted Peter Wright, an acknowledged radio expert working for the domestic security agency, MI5. This seems to have been a matter of expertise rather than jurisdiction. There appeared to be several radio beams, from shortwave to microwave, entering the US Embassy from a number of neighbouring properties in all directions, and all converging on a then-unique-in-Moscow IBM golfball typewriter in the Ambassador's outer office.

Supposedly, this allowed the Russians to read any document that was typed on the IBM machine, but Wright could have accomplished this without transmitting any signal at the typewriter. (Indeed, he had already read text typed at equivalent machines at the French Embassy in London during negotiations over Britain's entry to the Common Market). When operating, this typewriter had quite a distinctive electromagnetic signature of its own, and it was known to be in the US Ambassador's outer office. (The golfball spins and thumps: the ratio of spin to thump tells you the possible characters, and once you've got one word right, the whole message will fall into place.)

This made it an easy aiming point: KGB or GRU technicians setting up transmitters for the various shortwave and microwave beams in neighbouring buildings, could line their equipment up on the EM signature of the only Golfball typewriter in Moscow and know they were aimed at the Ambassador's office. And, indeed, the Ambassador's office, where all the beams converged, had by far the strongest field strength in the Embassy.

There were intelligence rumours that this was a sort of "mind control" project, and despite the obvious "tin foil hat" lunacy of this theory, it couldn't be discounted because there were several senior GRU and KGB officers known to sponsor research into tin foil hat projects. So much so, that any KGB scientist or technician wanting to do serious work, had to think of a supposed mind control application to get funds, and make his real project a spin-off from that. It didn't take many years for the CIA's own research-funding pattern to take the same form.

It was decided to tell the Embassy staff a cover story: that it was just attempted surveillance (which for all they knew in 1965, it might have been) and then observe everyone closely over a few years to see what happened, whilst the radio fields were constantly measured and monitored.

The Ambassador, Walter J. Stoessel Jr and his staff showed no signs of being mind-controlled, even after several years, but he and several of his secretarial staff and senior colleagues (the people who were in his office the most) became very ill: initially with blood disorders and then with lymphoma in the Ambassador's case and other cancers in the case of his senior members of staff.

Whether it was ever intended to "control minds" or not, the strong multi-frequency radio field in the Ambassador's office caused general malaise and nausea quite quickly, and more life-threatening conditions over time.

The radio frequency environment at VOCCT's house in Fredericksburg seems, at the time of writing, to closely resemble that in the US Ambassador's office in the Moscow Embassy between 1965 and 1976. There are radio beams converging on the house from adjacent properties on all sides (some of which are unoccupied) and this results in there being no part of the property which offers any refuge or even much alleviation from the very strong field that results where these beams all meet. However, the field seems to be strongest in VOCCT's bedroom and bathroom.

Without going into detail, (some of the information must wait for legal proceedings) the developer wants to obtain the house and its associated pasture, for development. He does not want to pay VOCCT any money for this, despite it being her lawful property from the settlement when the developer's son divorced her. The developer's contractors had a hand in building the house, in the eighties, which may explain why its structure is riddled with features helpful to intruders and voyeurs. The developer's son, a doctor, had advance knowledge of (and some influence over) the nearby hospital's long term expansion plans, and this may be why the house was built on a site which the hospital would eventually need. The divorce, and the inevitable award of the house to VOCCT as part of the settlement, must have thrown a spanner in the works of any long-term plan to profit from advance knowledge of the hospital's future.

The developer has gone to great lengths to cultivate, and indeed, house, mainly at his own expense, former Secret Servicemen, FBI Agents and Texas Rangers. The former are likely to have had secondhand knowledge of the radio beams in the Moscow Embassy just by being in the Secret Service at the time, and some of them may well even have been part of the investigation. Every agent concerned with the safety of serving and former presidents, would have been fully briefed on the radio beams and their dangers, even if the Embassy Staff weren't told.

The developer has provided subsidized housing to a group of people who would have known all the details of the radio beam harassment which Ambassador Walter J. Stoessel Jr. was subjected to, and, as if by magic, his ex daughter-in-law and grand-daughter, who have legal title to a property he'd like to develop, are being subjected to what looks like almost identical radio harassment.

As a parting thought: The breakdown of the relationship between the developer's son, and VOCCT, appears to date from the weekend of the 23rd to the 26th of April, 1999, when the developer's son appeared to travel a long way from home at very short notice and lied about where he'd been, and attempted to create a false record of precisely when he'd come back to Fredericksburg. That weekend will mean nothing to American law enforcement, but it should mean a great deal to Chief Superintendent Hamish Campbell and other senior officers of the Metropolitan Police Service at Scotland Yard.

Paper found on property as mentioned above:

Back to VOCCT:

And now the second reason for reposting this piece: I was diagnosed with a relatively rare form of lymphoma earlier this year and am currently undergoing treatment for it.

All of the new construction along my western fence line and in the vicinity of my house and land started immediately after I received my cancer diagnosis last spring. In fact, property that the local hospital had  quietly purchased at the northeast corner of Highway 16 and Friendship Lane for their expansion after the truth about the British incident Medawar refers to above began to come out is now being offered to local housing developers instead, according to the local newspaper, implying that the planned hospital expansion has moved back to my property. 

And the third reason for reposting Medawar's piece?  Simply to remind everyone that construction and property development on and around my property is forever linked to a number of known homicides, both slow and sudden, and that everyone involved in any way with this construction and development can be subject to prosecution at any time, since there is no statue of limitations for murder cases. The fact that one of these cases happens to be the most high-profile murder case of twentieth century Great Britain and that there are many people working very hard to get this case properly prosecuted should be serious food for thought. I can personally assure you that this case will never go away until the perpetrators are brought to justice, with my help or without it. There are simply too many people who now know the truth!! 

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Harassment Via WLAN/Wi-Fi



MONDAY, 24 JULY 2017

Harassment Via WLAN/Wi-Fi

Who does it?
Nutters, extremists who disagree with your right to have opinions that differ from theirs, property developers who want to force you to sell your house at below the market price, nerds who just think doing this sort of thing is "cool."

What Happens?
Especially when you are trying to work on the computer rather than just use it recreationally, the internet connection becomes slow or even stops altogether. This always happens at the most frustrating times possible, and calls to the ISP, helplines etc. never resolve the problem. (Although this is achieved using the WLAN, it still slows the router itself down to a crawl, so will affect you even if using an ethernet cable connection to the router.)

How is it done?
Somebody has studied your habits at length and by various means, including monitoring activity on your WLAN, so they know when you are likely to be doing something vital to your work or living your life. This is the basic method behind all forms of stalking, and it is generally something which the stalker greatly enjoys doing. Sometimes there is no other motive than the fact that the stalker gets off on doing this sort of thing.

They fit a surplus desktop computer that has a WLAN card, with a "directional aerial" aka "high-gain antennae" (often looks like a black Pringles tube) and they position this somewhere with a line of sight to your house, and preferably to wherever your router is, within your house. Using "net-stumbler" and the high gain antennae can help them to establish exactly where all your wireless devices are, so aiming the thing directly at your router is no real problem.

They use a progamme (which they can write themselves or buy online and download for a few pounds, dollars or small fragments of a bitcoin) to repeatedly poll your router, through the WLAN network(s) (you may have more than one from the same router, they will poll them all) for access. They don't need to have the password: the router's MPU still has to pay the attempted poll attention to determine that the supplied password or key is bogus. That's the point: the MPU works in "timeslices", and every timeslice it devotes to an attempt to handshake with it over the WLAN, is a timeslice that it cannot use for communicating with your device over the same WLAN, or via the Ethernet. It can't use that stolen timeslice for transmitting and receiving data over the actual internet connection, either.

Since the stalker's computer does nothing else exceptrepeatedly make failed handshakes with your router, the router's MPU ends up with few, if any, timeslices with which to process your legitimate activity and your connection stops working. 

Remember: a violent or hysterical reaction to this is one of the payoffs for the stalker, and he will have taken steps to mislead you, so that any violence by you is directed against an innocent party, and the stalker will be quick to call the police and spin them a tale, designed to get you arrested or shot. This leads into another form of stalking: "SWAT stalking" whereby repeated false emergency calls are made to get the victim arrested by armed police.

The stalker is probably breaking several laws: fitting a high-gain antennae to a source of radio interference is illegal in most jurisdictions, as is creating a public nuisance, and it is misuse of a computer and harassment.